Wednesday, January 29, 2020

I Believe Essay Example for Free

I Believe Essay Belief, according to www. freedictionary. com, is the mental act, condition, or habit of placing trust or confidence in another. It can also mean the mental acceptance of and conviction in the truth, actuality, or validity of something. Religion and science come in mind when belief is the topic. There are these things we call faith and fact. Other topics appear like the strength of a family bond, friendship, effect of a teacher on a student, and relationships. Religion and science appear to be the most outstanding when it comes to topics like this. There are too many people who question the things that they believe in and there are also a lot of people who firmly hold on to their beliefs as well. If asked, I would most likely write about religion and science and put them together, if possible. I believe in some of the scientific facts that we have so long held on to. For one, I believe that the theories and laws pertaining to physics are entirely accurate at the least, if not true in all instances. My every day experiences continue to reaffirm my beliefs in some of the most basic scientific facts. For example, the Earth’s gravity keeps everything in the planet bolted to the ground, in a manner of speaking. I walk every day and I am certain that the Earth’s gravity prevents me from aimlessly floating in the air. The scientific fact that there is always an opposing reaction to each force is also evident in everyday life. From the moment I step on the concrete pathway to the moment I return to bed at the end of the day, each force of the movements that I make have corresponding opposite reactionary forces which I thoroughly believe with no doubt. There is this question whether we believe in God or not. In science, there is this question on where the universe has all started. As for me, I do believe in God and I believe that He created the universe. I believe that God has no beginning and has no end. There are not too many occasions where I can relay a story where I can defend my belief in God and the creation of the universe. Although religion and science do not agree with each other all the time, there is something in me that bonds them together in my mind. When I say I believe in God, I do not reject my belief in science. I know that God created the universe, and the way He did it, that’s where, I think, science enters. On one occasion, I was asked by a close relative if I truly believe that God created the universe. Apparently, I responded on the affirmative. He then asked if my reply meant that I do not believe in science. Not necessarily, I told him. I explained that even though science seeks to quantify and establish facts through a rigid scientific method, one that prevents personal bias from getting involved in the identification of truthful facts, it does not necessarily mean that science also seeks to dispute religion. I told my relative to think of his body as an example. I told him that the human anatomy is composed of complex vital organs and processes that medical science has sought to explain and describe in purely scientific ways. Certainly, human evolution has played a key role in the development of our complex bodily organs and processes, and that his body is the product of the millions of years of evolution. However, I asked him if he thinks that something can come from nothing. Puzzled for a brief moment, he replied that it is impossible for something to come from nothing for nothing has â€Å"nothing† in it to cause anything. I then asked if he believes in the Big Bang Theory, to which he responded that he is still thinking about it to this day. Regardless, I said that the Big Bang Theory can be reconciled with the idea that God created the universe. Personally, I find it rather amusing that some people are having a difficult time thinking that the universe began with a â€Å"Big Bang†, and that beginning is God’s way to create everything that we can now experience. A masterful creator that God is, even the human body, I told my relative, has its roots from the image of God, and that human evolution is God’s way of helping the human species adapt to the changing environments of the planet which God created purposively in that manner. I believe in God and that it was in His power that created the universe. But because there is belief, one cannot help but doubt as well. Doubt can weaken the belief, but sometimes it can strengthen it too. I believe in God and the theory that the creation of universe started from Him. But where is the proof that these even existed? As people typically say, there is no proof enough to transform the non-believer. For the believer, his belief are always enough to safeguard his religious thoughts. Although one may find it difficult to reconcile religion with science, there is no reason to believe that the two should always clash. On the contrary, religion can reaffirm scientific facts while these facts can also serve to reaffirm religious beliefs. That science seeks the truth is enough to think that it ought not to be bias against religion because the quest for truth requires an open and critical mind without having to first establish a divergence from what religion espouses. That religion seeks to spread the same truth to humanity is enough to think that it ought not to dispose scientific facts as well. One can find plenty of common grounds between the two, and those are where people may begin to find their way into believing that science and religion can coexist in harmony.

Monday, January 20, 2020

The Disproof (and Proof) Of Everything :: essays research papers

The Disproof (and proof) of Everything Since the beginning of time, men (I'm speaking of the human race, this is not sexist in anyway because women are included in this too) have pondered our existence and purpose, as well as the nature of the world we live in. This is perhaps the single most time consuming thought we ever have for most people live their entire lifetimes without finding the answer or even coming close to one. I myself have pondered this question for most of my life, until recently when I used some odd (but logical) logic to come up with a strange conclusion: Nothing exists, and everything exists, for everything is possible all at the same time. Now, by now the reader of this paper is thinking "How is this possible?" or "This guy should be locked up!". Therefore, I plan to explain how I reached this conclusion in this paper. However, I must give fair warning, that some of the logic I used is strange and complex. If you have any doubts about your mental health, or are unsure of your capacities and limitations in any way, please do not read this, or at least do not take it seriously. For those of you who feel you can handle this, read on. Now, let us start at the most logical place to begin, the beginning. What is reality? Well, there are many explanations and theories about this, but I based mine on what I can observe and how I perceive things as a whole. Reality, as we know it seems to be made up of various dimensions. Most people will say reality is three dimensional, but it's really more than that. Time is often considered a fourth dimension, and some people say that there are at least eight known dimensions, possibly as many as thirty. However, it will be easier to start with dimensions from the ground up. Let us start with zero dimensions. A zero dimensional reality is a point. It does not extend in any direction, it is one point, there are no alternatives at all. This is the only type of reality in which a "fact" as we know it really exists. It either is or it isn't. Now, try to imagine a line. Well, there are several types of lines. There are infinite lines, which extend in both directions forever, and lines with one limit, and lines with two limits. Infinity with limits is still infinity. Suppose the line is limited, and is a certain length, not extending forever. This is a one dimensional reality,

Sunday, January 12, 2020

Introduction to Duty of Care in Health, Social Care or Children’s

CT235: Introduction to duty of care in health, social care or children’s and young people’s settings (level 2) Overview Introduction The assignment for unit CT235 asks you to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the principles for duty of care in health, social care or children’s and young peoples settings. The assignment is designed to ensure that by completing all the tasks, you will meet the learning outcomes and assessment criteria for this unit. Tasks There are three tasks to this assignment. Task A : short answer questions Task B: complete table Task C : short answer questions Task A: 1.Understand how duty of care contributes to safe practice Please answer the following: 1. What does duty of care mean in adult settings? (Ref:1. 1) The duty of care is a legal obligation imposed on an individual requiring that they adhere to a standard of reasonable care. It applies to everyone, organisations, even if not directly involved with the person and ensur es the safeguarding of you and others whom you support. 2. Describe how this affects your own job role (Ref 1. 2) We are here to ‘look after’ vulnerable adults and we have a duty to protect and serve the service users to the best of our ability. Related reading: Explain Legal and Organisational Requirements for Dealing With ComplaintsTask B: 2. Know how to address conflicts or dilemmas that may arise between an individuals rights and your duty of care Complete the following table: Example of potential conflict or dilemma (Ref: 2. 1)Where to get additional support and advice (Ref 2. 2) 1. A resident who is refusing to eat or drink anything Try to persuade them to eat or drink, calmly explain the importance of them eating and drinking, if that fails report to a senior member of staff and document the situation. 2. A resident who is being violent, abusive or un-cooperative.Give them time to calm down , be patient and try and make them feel safe and supported. Maybe there’s a reason behind the abuse and violence? Try and get to the bottom of it?. Talk to a senior member of staff and document the episodes maybe there’s a pattern. 3. A resident is refusing to shower or wash or have their clothes changed. Calmly expla in the importance of washing and personal hygiene see if it helps if not document and report to a senior member of staff. Task C: 3. Know how to respond to complaints. For this task please explain the following: 1.The main points of agreed procedures for handling complaints in adult settings (3. 1) Policies and procedures are in place to be followed, we have a complaints procedure which is easily accessible to service users and their prospective families. We have them easily accessible so that the service users know that they have a right to have an opinion and there are ways for them to be heard. 2. How would you respond to a complaint (3. 2) Following the complaints procedure I would report the complaint to a senior member of staff and document the complaint as necessary. Introduction to Duty of Care in Health, Social Care or Children’s CT235: Introduction to duty of care in health, social care or children’s and young people’s settings (level 2) Overview Introduction The assignment for unit CT235 asks you to demonstrate your knowledge and understanding of the principles for duty of care in health, social care or children’s and young peoples settings. The assignment is designed to ensure that by completing all the tasks, you will meet the learning outcomes and assessment criteria for this unit. Tasks There are three tasks to this assignment. Task A : short answer questions Task B: complete table Task C : short answer questions Task A: 1.Understand how duty of care contributes to safe practice Please answer the following: 1. What does duty of care mean in adult settings? (Ref:1. 1) The duty of care is a legal obligation imposed on an individual requiring that they adhere to a standard of reasonable care. It applies to everyone, organisations, even if not directly involved with the person and ensur es the safeguarding of you and others whom you support. 2. Describe how this affects your own job role (Ref 1. 2) We are here to ‘look after’ vulnerable adults and we have a duty to protect and serve the service users to the best of our ability. Related reading: Explain Legal and Organisational Requirements for Dealing With ComplaintsTask B: 2. Know how to address conflicts or dilemmas that may arise between an individuals rights and your duty of care Complete the following table: Example of potential conflict or dilemma (Ref: 2. 1)Where to get additional support and advice (Ref 2. 2) 1. A resident who is refusing to eat or drink anything Try to persuade them to eat or drink, calmly explain the importance of them eating and drinking, if that fails report to a senior member of staff and document the situation. 2. A resident who is being violent, abusive or un-cooperative.Give them time to calm down , be patient and try and make them feel safe and supported. Maybe there’s a reason behind the abuse and violence? Try and get to the bottom of it?. Talk to a senior member of staff and document the episodes maybe there’s a pattern. 3. A resident is refusing to shower or wash or have their clothes changed. Calmly expla in the importance of washing and personal hygiene see if it helps if not document and report to a senior member of staff. Task C: 3. Know how to respond to complaints. For this task please explain the following: 1.The main points of agreed procedures for handling complaints in adult settings (3. 1) Policies and procedures are in place to be followed, we have a complaints procedure which is easily accessible to service users and their prospective families. We have them easily accessible so that the service users know that they have a right to have an opinion and there are ways for them to be heard. 2. How would you respond to a complaint (3. 2) Following the complaints procedure I would report the complaint to a senior member of staff and document the complaint as necessary.

Saturday, January 4, 2020

How, and to what extent, was Margaret Thatcher successful Free Essay Example, 2500 words

The new post-war Britain was in a state of transition from his conventional politics and values when she left Grantham behind. Britain significantly transited during the World War II, thus making the circumstances favorable for the victory of the Labour Party of Clement Attlee in the year 1945. The year 1945 assumes immense significance as a point of transition in the political thinking history, with many changes happening on and after the culmination of the World War II being intensifications of the prevailing aspirations and conceptions instead of being new departures (Barker, 1996). The Attlee government built on the collectivism of the years of war and dwelled on the industrial nationalization, thus paving the way for the introduction of the welfare state. Complete employment became the political life’s overriding object to the politicians’ generation that had witnessed the 1930s’ mass unemployment. Margaret Thatcher proceeded with this like most of the ambi tious politicians before her. However, to maintain a full employment, it was essential for the Labour and Conservative successive governments to interfere more minutely into the economy in a variety of ways including the establishment of wages and dictation of prices. We will write a custom essay sample on How, and to what extent, was Margaret Thatcher successful or any topic specifically for you Only $17.96 $11.86/pageorder now In this process, the economic freedoms and the private enterprise which had to be supported by the Conservatives were crowded out. It was essentially â€Å"the road to serfdom† (Cowdrill, 2010, p. 88) as had been warned by Friedrich Hayek, the favorite intellectual guru of Margaret Thatcher in the year 1944. Some politicians and intellectuals including Keith Joseph and Enoch Powell rallied to the cause of Friedrich Hayek, but they were ridiculed as nonconformists whereas on her part, Margaret Thatcher resolved to climb the greasy pole. When she took the role of education secretary in the government of Edward Heath between 1970 and 1974, Heath firstly tried to adopt the approach of free-market into the economic management, but with the rise in the rate of unemployment beyond the 1m mark, he was pushed to take a U-turn. Then the government displayed spending binge of such a magnitude to decrease the rate of unemployment that by the year 1975, inflation went over 24 per cent (Cowdrill, 2010, p. 47) and a lot of people started hoarding food. That was the time when Margaret Thatcher became a Thatcherite. Joseph convinced her that the country would be saved by a free-market approach. These very daring policies in the year 1975 served as the agenda of Margaret Thatcher for the next decade and a half.